|
|
23 October 2006
To Rumania and Bulgaria with the Foreign Affairs Committee. These countries join the EU on 1 January next year and bring in a combined population of 30 million.
The government here is worried that unrestricted immigration is putting a strain on our housing, education, social security and job markets. A worker registration scheme is planned, to slow down the rate of migration. However, all EU citizens have an automatic right of residence here, so it is doubtful that any such scheme will work.
There are also concerns about serious organised crime and people smuggling in Rumania and Bulgaria. Our committee will report by the year end, but it is getting very late for the government to respond.
Back home, I am very sorry to see the closure of the Mendip Primary Care Trust. We are now back where we started, with a single authority for the whole of Somerset, based in Taunton. These endless reorganisations cost a lot of money. I have not been able to find out what it will cost to vacate the Priory site in Wells. It is certainly money that would be better spent on front line patient care, particularly as I am getting reports of services being withdrawn: acupuncture is the latest one.
The campaign for rural post offices hots up, with a very effective mass lobby of parliament last week. We have lost more than our share of post offices in Somerset already, damaging village life and creating more social isolation. But saving them is not just about signing petitions; it’s about using them. So let’s try and shop locally.
Finally, an unusual constituency case with a happy outcome. A lady in Street has two spaniel puppies who chewed up a £20 note. She sent the remaining fragments to the Bank of England but in vain: the watermark was not visible and no replacement was allowed. I took the case up and the Chief Cashier relented, sending a crisp new £20 note with solemn instructions not to feed it to the dogs.
20 March 2006
To New York and Washington as a member of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, which is doing a report on, ‘The War on Terror’.
The meetings in New York were mostly about the United Nations, which is undergoing an internal crisis over its funding. The ‘oil for food’ sanctions against Iraq led to a scandal involving UN staff. The big donor countries, such as America and Britain, are calling for fundamental reform. To anyone who has grappled with the European Union accounts, this is all rather familiar.
In Washington we had an intense round of meetings with every department connected with foreign policy, security and defence. They are dogged by the continuing failures in Iraq. Now Iran threatens to become a nuclear power and the Iranian president says he wants to ‘wipe Israel off the face of the earth’. Being a superpower has never been more difficult.
Flying back to Britain overnight, the weather was cold and clear and I had a bird’s eye view of the whole of southern England. I was struck by the swath of bright lights which make the country look like one giant conurbation. Every housing development now has its own street lights. And then there are the glaring security lights attached to buildings. A city like Bristol has a permanent orange glow above it.
Apart from the waste of energy, all this light pollution means that we never see a really glorious star studded sky. I belong to the Campaign for Dark Skies which argues for more responsible lighting and reminds people that the starry heavens are part of the environment too.
Back to more mundane matters, I find that farmers have been let down again over their Single Farm Payments. Delays mean that many farmers are having to sell stock or exceed their overdraft limits. More letters, more answers, and then more delays.
What is it about these big government bureaucracies that makes them so inefficient? Other examples are the Child Support Agency and the Tax Credit system. It’s one reason I am against a national identity card: I don’t trust government with all those personal details stored in one giant central computer.
19th December 2005
What is it about these big government bureaucracies that makes them so inefficient? Other examples are the Child Support Agency and the Tax Credit system. It’s one reason I am against a national identity card: I don’t trust government with all those personal details stored in one giant central computer.
The election of David Cameron as Leader of the Conservative Party has been like the throwing a large rock into the political pond. Not only has it shaken up the Conservative Party but it has had a disruptive effect on the leaders (and leaders in waiting) of the other two parties. Who knows what will happen in 2006 if this speed of change continues.
By agreement with David Cameron I am returning to the backbenches, where I have been twice before. If we win an election he will need experienced ministers again. Meanwhile it is right that he brings on new talent from recent intakes.
I am joining the Foreign Affairs Select Committee for the first time, and will also keep my place on the European Standing Committee. This gives me a vantage point to guard our liberties, and I also hope to do more to help the developing world by breaking down barriers to trade and aid.
Nearer to home, there is a real threat to our local policing. The government seems determined to merge the Avon and Somerset constabulary into a single South West regional police force. This huge area, covering six counties, is completely artificial and has no popular loyalty or identity. This is Whitehall interference at its worst. I fully support our Police Authority in resisting these changes and I am doing all I can in debates and questions to ministers, to try and get the government to see sense.
I have a wider concern. Regional bodies are proliferating: health, fire services, development agencies and the Regional Assembly. And now the police. It suits the bureaucratic mind to go for large impersonal units. And it suits the EU too: there is a South West Regional Office in Brussels, paid for out of our council tax. But parliament has never agreed to this regional break up of the UK, and the only referendum to be held on the subject, in the North East last year, resulted in a resounding no vote by the people.
I have been doing the usual round of pre-Christmas visits in the constituency. My Wells office will be closed next week and open again on 3rd January. May I wish everyone a peaceful and happy Christmas. It will be an eventful new year.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
31 October 2005
The first of the Conservative leadership contenders came and spoke in the Wells constituency this week. David Cameron addressed a meeting in Burnham on Sea and was questioned by some of the party members who will choose between him and David Davis at the end of the month.
This is one election where the result is not known in advance because there is no reliable polling evidence about the 250,000 members nationally who will vote. I will be voting for Cameron, based on two quite lengthy conversations I have had with him about policy. His rise has certainly been meteoric but in my view is based on foundations of principle.
Back in the House of Commons we are grappling with the Terrorism bill. I am against the proposal to detain suspects for up to three months without charge or trial. The government say that the police and the security service want this power, but this is the same security service that predicted weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and then couldn’t find them.
Our liberties are being eroded in too many ways: ID cards, smoking bans, licensing laws, and endless new regulations. Then there is the proposed ban on, ‘incitement to religious hatred’, which will undoubtedly stifle robust debate about religion.
Governments are always inventing new restrictions on grounds of necessity or the supposed public good. It is the job of parliament to stand up for our hard won liberties and I hope that MPs of all parties will uphold this.
Nearer to home, I have met our Chief Constable about plans to reorganise the Avon & Somerset Constabulary. This is part of the government’s aim to reduce the number of police forces from the present 43 down to a smaller number of ‘strategic forces’. The worst proposal is for a single South-West Regional Force stretching from Gloucester down to Cornwall. I will fight it hard: we need more local policing, not huge units.
Finally, something completely different: bees. Local bee keepers are up in arms about a proposed reduction in government funding for bee protection. Honey bees are susceptible to a number of imported diseases such as European Foul Brood, but the government wants to reduce the number of inspectors.
|
|